This article was first published on Central European Institute of Asian Studies (CEIAS).
While Taiwanese politics in 2025 were first engulfed by recall campaigns and later by a constitutional crisis, some legislative changes flew under the radar. One of them is small on paper but potentially transformative in practice: a reform that strengthens women’s political representation at the local level.
Key takeaways:
-
Taiwan’s high level of women’s representation at the national level masks persistent gender gaps in local politics, especially in rural areas.The former local-level quota system structurally disadvantaged women in small constituencies and entrenched all-male councils.
-
The new 1:3 gender-neutral quota approved in November 2025 corrects these distortions, but its delayed implementation until 2030 tempers its immediate impact.
-
Taiwan’s experience shows that quotas matter, but they need to be combined with sustained political mobilisation and institutional follow-through.
Women in Taiwanese politics: An Asian outlier
Despite some progress, women worldwide continue to face substantial barriers to political participation and decision-making. In Asia, however, Taiwan stands out as a clear outlier (and a regional benchmark) when it comes to women’s political inclusion. Taiwan had a woman president for two consecutive terms (2016–24), women regularly serve in cabinet positions, and nearly 42% of legislators are women, making Taiwan the most gender-equal political system in Asia by this measure.
The obvious question is how Taiwan achieved this level of inclusion. A central explanation lies in the early adoption and gradual expansion of gender quota mechanisms. Although these quotas were broadened during the 1990s and early 2000s, their origins reach much further back. Women educated abroad, particularly those influenced by the US suffrage movement and global feminist debates, played a decisive role in securing explicit gender quotas in the 1946 Constitution of the Republic of China. At the time, such provisions were exceptionally progressive. Even today, the constitutional entrenchment of gender quotas remains rare worldwide.
As a result, Taiwan’s political system constitutionally guarantees gender quotas at both national and local levels, with specific laws governing their implementation. These guarantees are reinforced by a multilayered system of additional mechanisms. Political parties must maintain a 50:50 gender balance on party lists, while government commissions, advisory bodies, and other official institutions are typically subject to a one-third gender-neutral quota, requiring at least one-third women, one-third men, and one-third open.
Quotas as the enabler, not the silver bullet
Over the past three decades, electoral gender quotas have spread globally and are widely regarded as an effective way to address the structural barriers women face in entering politics. At the same time, quotas have attracted persistent criticism. Skeptics argue that quotas may increase the number of women in office without improving substantive equality and reducing empowerment to a purely numerical exercise.
Taiwan’s experience cuts through this debate. Quotas were decisive in increasing women’s political representation, but they did not emerge or expand automatically. Organised women’s movements fought for their adoption, defended them against rollback, and pushed for their continuous refinement. Institutionalised quotas created an entry point, but sustained feminist mobilisation ensured that descriptive gains translated into lasting institutional change.
The result has been a mutually reinforcing cycle: institutional reform enabled women’s access to power, while social mobilisation prevented that access from becoming symbolic or reversible. This interaction helps explain why Taiwan has become a standout case of gender-inclusive politics in Asia.
The local-level blind spot
Despite strong national-level representation, women remain significantly underrepresented in Taiwan’s local politics. The reason lies in a different regulatory framework. Elections for city and county councils are governed by the Local Government Act, adopted in 1998 and first applied in the 2002 local elections.
Under this law, gender representation followed a so-called 1:4 rule: if a district elected four councilors, at least one had to be a woman; for every additional four seats, one additional woman was required. In practice, however, this system rarely translated into 25% female representation. Small and rural districts were particularly disadvantaged. Districts with only three seats required no women at all; districts with seven seats still mandated only one. As a result, the share of women in local councils typically ranged between 15% and 25% where the rule applied, and in many rural constituencies, councils remained entirely male.
While the quota encouraged parties to nominate some female candidates, its structural flaws were substantial. In the last local elections, in 2022, nearly half of Taiwan’s 600-plus electoral districts elected no women, and in 40% of districts, no women ran at all. Alarmingly, four districts—Datong (Yilan), Jhutian (Pingtung), Checheng (Pingtung), and Wuqiu (Kinmen)—have not elected a single woman since 2010.
A reform enabled by political contingency
The November 2025 amendment to the Local Government Act directly addresses these shortcomings. It raises the quota from one out of every four seats to one out of every three seats and introduces a gender-neutral formulation: one seat must go to a woman, one to a man, and one remains unrestricted.
Interestingly, the reform was not originally expected to move forward so quickly. The ruling Democratic Progressive Party was hesitant to push for changes ahead of the 2026 local elections, fearing resistance from local party organisations already deep into candidate selection. The political opening came instead from the Kuomintang, which held a majority in parliament, reopening the law to amend provisions on deputy mayors (increasing the number of deputy mayors). Once the act was back on the parliamentary agenda, Article 33, the quota clause, became an area of rare cross-party consensus.
The compromise, however, is that the new quota will only take effect in the 2030 local elections.
Progress delayed, but not denied
Taiwan’s constitutionally anchored quota system remains one of the most robust frameworks for advancing women’s political rights in Asia and beyond. Its layered design has produced tangible results at the national level, helping Taiwan become one of the world’s most gender-equitable democracies.
Yet local politics exposed the system’s limits. The previous 1:4 quota (still valid until 2030) entrenched urban–rural disparities and allowed all-male councils to persist in small constituencies. The new 1:3 gender-neutral quota directly addresses these distortions, aligning local governance more closely with Taiwan’s broader gender-equality commitments, including its obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, which Taiwan adopted into its domestic legal framework.
The delayed implementation until 2030 tempers the reform’s immediate impact, but it does not negate its significance. Taiwan’s experience once again illustrates a broader lesson: quotas can open doors, but sustained political pressure is required to ensure those doors remain open and lead to somewhere meaningful.